Improvement of Fat Grafting With Platelet Rich Plasma
Improvement of Fat Grafting With Platelet Rich Plasma: A Simple, Cost-effective and Safe Method
The importance of addressing volume loss is becoming increasingly evident to cosmetic surgeons and patients. This volume loss can be corrected through several means, including tissue repositioning
(e.g. facial lifting), implants (e.g. malar implants), synthetic fillers (e.g. hyaluronic acid) or autologous tissue. Nowadays autologous fat grafting is considered as an ideal filler, and became a clinical reality in aesthetic
medicine and surgery. The success of fat grafting ensue from the fact that the fat tissue is
an abundant source of regenerative pluripotential cells: preadipocytes, adipocytes, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), endothelial cells, etc., all capable to survive, to integrate into host tissue and to secrete an important
orchestrated quantity of cytokines and growth factors: vascular growth factor (VEGF), hepatocyte gowth factor (HGF) insulin-like growth factor (IGF), platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), and transforming growth
factor-beta (TGF β).1 Main advantages of fat grafting include 1) a long-lasting result contrary to the synthetic resorbable products, 2) prevention of granuloma development or allergic reaction which could be seen with permanent fillers, 3) a natural consistency, 4) improvement of cutaneous and subcutaneous trophicity, and 5) the fact that this technique could be proposed to almost all patients presenting enough fat tissue.
On the other hand, disadvantages of autologous fat grafting include 1) its complexity of use, requiring a more important learning curve with regard to the prepared products, 2) the morbidity and the necessity
of donor site, that sometimes could not be enough, and mainly 3) the unpredictability of the remaining volume2 by partial uncontrolled absorption of the fat transplant.
To address this latter important disadvantage, we propose the addition of autologous, platelet rich plasma (PRP) which is known as a natural reservoir of growth factors.
Autologous Fat Grafting
The transplant of autologous fat tissue, so called lipomodelage, liposculpture or lipofilling is known since the beginning of 20th century. The principle of the technique is to transfer patient’s own fat tissue from a donor site (abdomen, flanks, thighs) to a site where it misses volume. Its first indications were for aesthetic surgery of the face,3 then for hands.4 Fat grafting is also useful for tissue loss due to an accident, operation, congenital disease or lipodystrophy.5, 6 In addition to a volumizing effect, the injected fat leads to a
neoangiogenesis effect7 improving the cutaneous trophicity, and to an anti-aging effect.1 This technique
is thus also recommended for wound healing,8 scar reduction,9,10 radiodermitis treatment11 and correction of acne scars.12 During the last decade, fat grafting has been used more and more
frequently for breast reconstruction and augmentation.13,14 Even if Neuber postponed in 1893, for the first time, the transfer of fat tissue, the first description of the fat transplantation by infiltration dates from 1962 by Miller. Given the little satisfactory long-term results, this technique did not have the expected success and other numerous methods were described. At present, the most used method for the fat harvesting, purification and infiltration is the one described in detail by Coleman in 1986.15,16 This method takes into account the fragility of fat cells during the various steps of the treatment. The survival rate and longstanding results depend partially on indications and patients but mostly on surgical technique. However, even with the best surgical technique, the fat grafting survival is unpredictable, with a variable resorption rate reported throughout the literature (10% to 90%). Different techniques have been proposed to improve the survival rate of fat grafting and its predictability. The most efficient technique proposed until today is to highly enrich the grafted tissue on mesenchymal stem cells. However most of these technique are time consuming, expensive with significant harvested fat loss, and the results still remain unpredictable. Another approach to improve the fat grafting results could be stimulation of transplanted tissue by growth factors. Unfortunately, the exogenous and synthetic growth factors treatment didn’t give the desired expected results in clinic (e.g., wound healing treatment, bioengineering). One of the reasons is the protein fragility and instability of growth factors. Recently, autologous platelets considered as a natural reservoir of growth factors has been used for different pathologies. So, we suggest that its addition to fat grafts could be a solution to boost stem cell survival, multiplication and differentiation to finally improve the long standing results of lipofilling efficiently and simply.
Platelets Rich Plasma (PRP
Platelets are enucleated circulating blood particles that derive from the fragmentation of megakaryocytes. They circulate in an inactivate state until they come into contact with endothelia damage areas. Platelets work via the degranulation of the α-granules in platelets, which contain the synthesized and pre-packed growth factors. The most potent ones in restoring damaged tissues are PDGF, TGFβ, IGF, VEFG and endothelial growth factor (EGF). The synthesized growth factors directly bind to the surface of cell membranes to stimulate haemostasis and normal healing. They induce internal cellular signaling that activates angiogenesis, cell proliferation, cell differentiation and new matrix formation for tissue repair. Platelets are therefore a natural reservoir of growth factors that could be
used to regenerate tissues. Previous topical growth factor studies have shown that synthetic human platelet-derived growth factors could be an efficacious treatment for wound healing. However, as those synthetic proteins presented some limits for clinical use, a newer treatment, autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP), has been developed. It represents a greater similarity to the natural healing
process as a composite of multiple growth factors. It is safe due to its autologous nature, and is produced simply as needed from the
patient’s blood. After 30 years of PRP clinical application to stimulate bone regeneration and wound healing, autologous PRP is actually recognized as a new tissue engineering element and a developing area for clinicians and researchers that helps healing of soft and hard tissues. The benefit and safety of PRP is documented in more than 5,000 studies where the authors observed enhancement of 1) bone regeneration,17-19 2) wound healing,20-22 3) tendon and cartilage healing,23-25 4) corneal healing,26 and skin rejuvenation.27 PRP is thus used more and more often in the plastic, reconstructive and aesthetic surgery fields.28-30
Fat Graft And PRP
Recently, there has been increased interest in the co-application of PRP and fat grafts. The live fat tissue is revascularized at the transplantation site within 48 hours. During this time, it is fed by diffused material in the plasma. In contrast, non-viable tissue is removed by macrophages, leaving behind fibrotic and cystic changes. The main obstacles preventing permanent augmentation are partial absorption and ischemia of the transplanted fat, which often necessitate multiple transplantations. Then, the quality of
transplanted tissue becomes highly dependent on the healing process, restoration of vascularisation and adipocyte differentiation.
The reported rates of fat cell survival vary greatly in the medical literature, and different techniques of harvesting, processing, and
reinjecting the fat cells are claimed to be responsible for these differences. However, there is no concensus concerning the best way to process the harvested fat before reinjection. Based on recent literature, we hypothesized that adding PRP to fat preparation may be a reliable way to bring appropriate nutrient at the early moments of transplantation to improve fat survival and render the result more predictable. PRP releases the native growth factors in their biologically determined ratios at the treatment site. Released growth factors stimulate angiogenesis, cell differentiation and proliferation leading to the reconstitution of the tridimensional matrix that
allows the rearrangement of adipocytes into the correct 3D organization. Providing a blood supply on which fat cells are extremely dependent creates an optimal in vivo environment to promote fat implantation. This approach is completely autologous and immediately employed without any type of in vitro preconditioning or media complement. In a series of in vitro studies, it has been demonstrated that PRP increases fat cells survival rate and stem cells differentiation.28, 31 Nakamura et al & showed that fat graft survival rates are significantly increased in rats.32 And finally, several clinical cases have been reported to improve wound healing by association of fat grafting with PRP.33 There is also some successful cases of facial reconstruction with fat grafting and PRP.34 This association has recently been also described for aesthetic cases.35
Fat grafting with PRP technique
First of all, patients must be assessed correctly during initial consultation. Volume loss occurs in various patterns according to its cause; diffuse volume loss after massive weight loss is different from localized volume loss only in nasolabial, infraorbital region or lips due to aging. Skin texture and thickness is another point to be evaluated before treatment. Patient information is very important because the agreement between patient’s expectation and the result that can be offered by the treatment is a warranty
of satisfaction. Adipocytes have short lifespans once removed from the body, and they do not react well to excessive handling, refrigeration or major trauma during tissue collection or processing. The fat graft resorption is the main drawback 36,37 which could
be dramatically reduced by using good technique. The method described by Coleman advances the principle that the fat transplants have to survive and be revascularized, Coleman et al, recommends a small quantity of fat injection in fine layers15 to increase
the proportion of fat graft surface area to receptor bed. The total procedure could be realized with local or general anaesthesia, according to patient/physician preference and the importance of fat volume previewed to be grafted.
The most common donor site in clinical practice is the abdomen, but the fat could be harvested from any location that presents adequate non-fibrous fat flank, thigh, medial knee which is patient-specific, and dependent on patient/physician preference. There is no compelling evidence regarding harvest site and efficacy of fat grafting.38 Fat Harvesting Adipocyte viability decreases with increasing negative suction pressure.39 Thus, mechanical liposuction by machine should be avoided (~500 mlHg), and only manual harvesting offers a satisfied fat graft quality.40 Low pressure vacuum, created by a 2cc withdrawing plunger of a 10 ml Luer Lock® syringe, gives the best result.
The fat harvesting is performed with a blunt cannula connected to 10ml Luer Lock® syringe. The ideal cannula combines efficient
collection of fat parcels with minimal neurovascular damage. The most used is a blunt tip cannula with a single distal opening of 3mm diameter. For small and precise fat grafting (e.g. suborbital region) we suggest the use of small 1.65mm cannula.
The ideal method for fat purification would separate blood, infiltration fluid, and cell debris from healthy adipocytes with minimal trauma [Figure 1]. This particular step is the most complicated part of the fat grafting procedure, subjected to intense scrutiny without, however, a definitive solution. While various methods for separating out fat have been described, none has been determined to be superior to the others, but it is accepted that techniques involving less manipulation may have better outcomes:
• Sedimentation: aspirate material stands for 30 minutes to 1 hour, which separates it into its various components.41
• Washing: aspirate fat is washed with 5% glucose solution, 0.9% normal saline, or sterile water.42
• Filtration: harvested fat is placed on sterile gauze over sterile cup, washed with Ringer’s lactate and dried before loading into syringes.43
• Centrifugation: harvested fat centrifugation separates fat from substances that increase degradation, and concentrates adipocytes and stem cells per milliliter of fat transplanted.44 It is the most rapid and clean method.
Various studies assessed the impact of centrifugation on fat transfer, and most of have concluded that centrifugation, unless conducted at very high speeds, does not adversely affect adipocyte viability.45, 46 Coleman suggests 3000rpm for 3 minutes, but 1 minute of centrifugation is as efficient with less harm to fat cells.
Today, there are different techniques for PRP preparation in the market. Since 2003, RegenLab has developed a new technique to prepare autologous PRP from whole patient blood. This is a simple and safe method to realize in the operating room while maintaining low cost. It requires no specialized skill and a small amount (8 ml) of patient’s blood is enough. In comparison to other methods, this technique has also been shown to offer the best platelet concentration and survival, with highest growth factor secretion.47, 48 This method of PRP preparation has already shown good results for bone regeneration and skin rejuvenation.17,49 As it is a safe, efficient, simple and cheap system for a better and predictable fat grafting, in our clinical practice, we use this RegenLab PRP preparation method.
Eight ml of blood is withdrawn from patient’s peripheral vein in Regen-tubes containing sodium citrate anticoagulant. The whole blood is centrifugated at 3000rpm for 5min. As Regen-tubes contain a special gel separator, 99% of red blood cells are discarded from the plasma at the bottom of the gel. Platelets and white blood cells are pellet on top of the gel and re-suspended in plasma by gently mixing the tube. The 4ml of cell suspension is called the PRP.
Fat And PRP mixture
The fat purified by centrifugation is mixed through a 3-ways connector with different amounts of PRP depending on the indication and the localization of the receiver site. For skin rejuvenation, superficial scars correction and under eye site, we propose >50% of PRP. For deep filler indication (nasolabial folds, lips, or soft tissue defect) we add 20% of PRP to 80% of purified fat.
The fat/PRP mixture is transferred from 10ml Luer Lock® syringes to 1ml or 3ml Luer Lock® syringes via a 3-ways connector [Figure 3]. It is important to use smaller syringe, because the fat placement is more precise. For fat placement, special blunt cannula (0.75mm to 1.65mm) is connected to the 1 or 3ml syringes. As suggested by Coleman, fat is injected in small parcels and thin strips in several layers15. Before injection, it is recommended to create some tunnels, especially in nasolabial region or in scars, to release fibrotic tissues. The fat graft is then placed by a withdrawing way.
A basic principle of aesthetic surgery is to replace “like with like”. Autologous fat transfer offers many of qualities of an ideal soft tissue filler: it is biocompatible, inexpensive, readily available, nonteratogenic, non migratrory with long term results. However, even with the best technique, the survival rate is still quite variable and unpredictable. The addition of PRP to fat grafts represents many advantages with a simple, costeffective and safe method. We recommend this combination for all fat grafting, but especially for aesthetic purposes (Images 1& 2). In addition to its booster effect on fat grafts, PRP has a rejuvenation capacity per se. It is also used on nappage technique, for skin or hair regeneration.
To summarize, we conclude that the addition of PRP to fat grafts offers several advantages: 1 better
fat grafting survival, 2 less bruising and inflammation, and 3 easier application of fat grafts due to liquefaction effect of PRP.
1. Kim, W.S., B.S. Park, and J.H. Sung, Protective role of adipose-derived stem cells and their soluble factors in photoaging. Arch Dermatol Res, 2009. 301(5): p. 329-36.
2. Miller, J.J. and J.C. Popp, Fat hypertrophy after autologous fat transfer. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 2002. 18(3): p. 228-31.
3. Coleman, S.R., Facial recontouring with lipostructure. Clin Plast Surg, 1997. 24(2): p. 347-67.
4. Coleman, S.R., Hand rejuvenation with structural fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2002. 110(7): p. 1731-44; discussion 1745-7.
5. Cohen, G. and A. Treherne, Treatment of facial lipoatrophy via autologous fat transfer. J Drugs Dermatol, 2009. 8(5): p. 486-9.
6. Serra-Renom, J.M. and J. Fontdevila, Treatment of facial fat atrophy related to treatment with protease inhibitors by autologous fat injection in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2004. 114(2): p. 551-5; discussion 556-7.
7. Nishimura, T., et al., Microvascular angiogenesis and apoptosis in the survival of free fat grafts. Laryngoscope, 2000. 110(8): p. 1333-8.
8. Cervelli, V., P. Gentile, and M. Grimaldi, Regenerative surgery: use of fat grafting combined with platelet-rich plasma for chronic lower-extremity ulcers. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2009. 33(3): p. 340-5.
9. Klinger, M., et al., Fat injection for cases of severe burn outcomes: a new perspective of scar remodeling and reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2008.32(3): p. 465-9.
10. de Benito, J., I. Fernandez, and V. Nanda, Treatment of depressed scars with a dissecting cannula and an autologous fat graft. Aesthetic Plast Surg,1999. 23(5): p. 367-70.
11. Rigotti, G., et al., Clinical treatment of radiotherapy tissue damage by lipoaspirate transplant: a healing process mediated by adipose-derived adult stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2007. 119(5): p. 1409-22; discussion 1423-4.
12. Lam, S.M., R.A. Glasgold, and M.J. Glasgold, Limitations, complications, and long-term sequelae of fat transfer. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 2008. 16(4): p. 391-9, v.
13. Coleman, S.R. and A.P. Saboeiro, Fat grafting to the breast revisited: safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2007. 119(3): p. 775-85; discussion 786-7.
14. Delay, E., et al., Fat injection to the breast: technique, results, and indications based on 880 procedures over 10 years. Aesthet Surg J, 2009. 29(5): p. 360-76.
15. Coleman, W.P., 3rd, Autologous fat transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1991. 88(4): p. 736.
16. Kaufman, M.R., et al., Autologous fat transfer national consensus survey: trends in techniques for harvest, preparation, and application, and perception of short- and long-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2007. 119(1): p. 323-31.
17. Marx, R.E., et al., Platelet-rich plasma: Growth factor enhancement for bone grafts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 1998. 85(6): p. 638-46.
18. Garg, A.K., The use of platelet-rich plasma to enhance the success of bone grafts around dental implants. Dent Implantol Update, 2000. 11(3): p. 17-21.
19. Mooren, R.E., et al., The effect of platelet-rich plasma on early and late bone healing using a mixture of particulate autogenous cancellous bone and Bio-Oss: an experimental study in goats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010. 39(4): p. 371-8.
20. Villela, D.L. and V.L. Santos, Evidence on the use of platelet-rich plasma for diabetic ulcer: a systematic review. Growth Factors, 2010. 28(2): p. 111-6.
21. Pallua, N., T. Wolter, and M. Markowicz, Platelet-rich plasma in burns. Burns, 2010. 36(1): p. 4-8.
22. Lacci, K.M. and A. Dardik, Platelet-rich plasma: support for its use in wound healing. Yale J Biol Med, 2010. 83(1): p. 1-9.
23. Lubowitz, J.H. and G.G. Poehling, Shoulder, hip, knee, and PRP. Arthroscopy, 2010. 26(2): p. 141-2.
24. Peerbooms, J.C., et al., Positive effect of an autologous platelet concentrate in lateral epicondylitis in a double-blind randomized controlled trial: platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection with a 1-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med, 2010. 38(2): p. 255-62.
25. Creaney, L., Platelet-rich plasma for treatment of Achilles tendinopathy. JAMA, 2010. 303(17): p. 1696; author reply 1697-8.
26. Tanidir, S.T., et al., The effect of subconjunctival platelet-rich plasma on corneal epithelial wound healing. Cornea, 2010. 29(6): p. 664-9.
27. Ebisawa, K., et al., [Regenerative medicine for anti-aging]. Nippon Rinsho, 2009. 67(7): p. 1402-6.
28. Cervelli, V., et al., Application of platelet-rich plasma in plastic surgery: clinical and in vitro evaluation. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 2009. 15(4): p. 625-34.
29. Adler, S.C. and K.J. Kent, Enhancing wound healing with growth factors. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 2002. 10(2): p. 129-46.
30. Man, D., H. Plosker, and J.E. Winland-Brown, The use of autologous platelet-rich plasma (platelet gel) and autologous platelet-poor plasma (fibrin glue) in cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2001. 107(1): p. 229-37; discussion 238-9.
31. Kakudo, N., et al., Proliferation-promoting effect of platelet-rich plasma on human adipose-derived stem cells and human dermal fibroblasts. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2008. 122(5): p. 1352-60.
32. Nakamura, S., et al., Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) promotes survival of fat-grafts in rats. Ann Plast Surg, 2010. 65(1): p. 101-6.
33. Cervelli, V., et al., Tissue regeneration in loss of substance on the lower limbs through use of platelet-rich plasma, stem cells from adipose tissue, and hyaluronic acid. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2010. 23(6): p. 262-72.
34. Cervelli, V. and P. Gentile, Use of cell fat mixed with platelet gel in progressive hemifacial atrophy. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2009. 33(1): p. 22-7.
35. Cervelli, V., et al., Autologous platelet-rich plasma mixed with purified fat graft in aesthetic plastic surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2009. 33(5): p. 716-21.
36. Ersek, R.A., Transplantation of purified autologous fat: a 3-year follow-up is disappointing. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1991. 87(2): p. 219-27; discussion 228.
37. Chajchir, A., Fat injection: long-term follow-Up. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 1996. 20(4): p. 291-6.
38. Rohrich, R.J., E.S. Sorokin, and S.A. Brown, In search of improved fat transfer viability: a quantitative analysis of the role of centrifugation and harvest site. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2004. 113(1): p. 391-5; discussion 396-7.
39. Adanali, G., et al., A new, T-shaped adaptor for easy, quick and efficient fat harvesting during liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2002. 26(5): p. 340-4.
40. Witort, E.J., et al., Autologous lipofilling: coenzyme Q10 can rescue adipocytes from stress-induced apoptotic death. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2007. 119(4): p. 1191-9.
41. Rose, J.G., Jr., et al., Histologic comparison of autologous fat processing methods. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 2006. 22(3): p. 195-200.
42. Fournier, P.F., Fat grafting: my technique. Dermatol Surg, 2000. 26(12): p. 1117-28.
43. Kuran, I. and B. Tumerdem, A new simple method used to prepare fat for injection. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2005. 29(1): p. 18-22; discussion 23.
44. Shiffman, M.A. and M.V. Kaminski, Fat transfer to the face: technique and new concepts. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 2001. 9(2): p. 229-37, viii.
45. Kurita, M., et al., Influences of centrifugation on cells and tissues in liposuction aspirates: optimized centrifugation for lipotransfer and cell isolation. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2008. 121(3): p. 1033-41; discussion 1042-3.
46. Conde-Green, A., N.F. de Amorim, and I. Pitanguy, Influence of decantation, washing and centrifugation on adipocyte and mesenchymal stem cell content of aspirated adipose tissue: a comparative study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2010. 63(8): p. 1375-81.
47. Marx, R.E., Platelet-rich plasma: evidence to support its use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004. 62(4): p. 489-96.
48. Mazzucco, L., et al., Not every PRP-gel is born equal. Evaluation of growth factor availability for tissues through four PRP-gel preparations: Fibrinet, RegenPRP-Kit, Plateltex and one manual procedure. Vox Sang, 2009. 97(2): p. 110-8.
49. Redaelli, A., D. Romano, and A. Marciano, Face and neck revitalization with platelet-rich plasma (PRP): clinical outcome in a series of 23 consecutively treated patients. J Drugs Dermatol, 2010. 9(5): p. 466-72.